What is a key reason for reviewing processes to avoid the Halo Effect?

A key reason for reviewing processes to avoid the Halo Effect is to prevent personal opinions from overly influencing assessments. The Halo Effect occurs when a single positive trait or experience with a person disproportionately colors the overall perception of that individual, which can lead to biased evaluations. By reviewing processes, organizations can implement methods and standards that ensure evaluations are fair and based on objective criteria rather than subjective impressions. This helps in making assessments more consistent and accurate, allowing for a clearer understanding of an individual's capabilities and performance.

While enhancing team morale, standardizing evaluations, and guaranteeing a positive work environment may be beneficial aspects of a well-structured review process, they do not directly address the specific issue of minimizing the bias introduced by personal feelings and perceptions, which is the primary concern with the Halo Effect.