Which of the following is a method to challenge or prevent Group Think?

Allocating time for critical evaluation of discussed options is an effective method to challenge or prevent Group Think because it encourages individuals to carefully assess the ideas and decisions being put forward. This practice allows team members to express their opinions, question assumptions, and consider alternative perspectives, which is vital for fostering an environment where diverse thoughts can flourish. Critical evaluation helps to uncover potential flaws in reasoning or planning that might be overlooked in a more hurried or consensus-driven context.

In contrast, limiting discussions to a small group of leaders can reinforce existing opinions and discourage broader participation, which can contribute to a narrow viewpoint. Encouraging silence to avoid conflict often leads to suppressed voices and ideas, impacting the richness of the discussion. Finally, promoting rapid decision-making without reflection can result in hasty conclusions and overlook significant details or potential risks, further entrenching Group Think tendencies rather than mitigating them.